top of page

100% of the People Who Died of COVID were Fully Vaccinated in New Brunswick Sept 3 – Oct 8, 2022

Updated: Oct 13, 2022

100% of the people who died of COVID in New Brunswick from September 3rd through October 8th, 2022, were “protected”, meaning they had a dose of a COVID-19 vaccine within the prior 6 months. Have all the unvaccinated people finally died?

The campaign against New Brunswickers who chose not to take a COVID-19 vaccine was based on a deliberate lie. Even though government and health officials said the vaccines would stop transmission of the virus then enacted draconian measures against unvaccinated people, a Pfizer executive admitted the vaccines weren’t studied to test transmission prevention. The lack of study was a known fact BEFORE the vaccines were ever rolled out to the public. So, when Chief Medical Officer Jennifer Russell, Premier Higgs and then Minister of Health Dorothy Shephard stated these vaccines as well as the subsequent mandates, created to punish the unvaccinated, were needed in order to protect others, where were they getting that information? Certainly not from the manufacturer. Can they produce whatever study they used to back up those mandates?

How effective are they?

These vaccines must be fantastic. What are some people at now, 4th or 5th doses? The new COVID-19 vaccine Bivalent will, according to officials, protect you against the original strain of COVID and the BA.1 variant. Does the original strain of COVID even exist any longer? And according to GNB’s own data, 90% of current COVID cases in New Brunswick are the BA.5 variant, while 0% are the OG strain or BA.1. So basically, this vaccine is about as useful as calling a plumber to fix your transmission, yet people keep lining up for it.

They're so great in fact that NACI now recommends Canadians get a booster every 90 days.

They still want the public to believe that unvaccinated New Brunswickers are more at risk, but is it true?

Clearly not for dying from COVID, but let’s take a look at hospitalizations and ICU admissions. An important note though, unprotected doesn't mean unvaccinated, it simply means the person's last shot was more than 6 months ago.

For the same time period of September 3, 2022 through October 8, 2022, hospitalizations for the protected class was 80 vs. 28 in the unprotected class. ICU admissions for the protected class was 2 vs. 3 in the unprotected class.

There it is! The smoking gun to support the statement that the unprotected are more affected! One additional 'unprotected' person was admitted to the ICU than 'protected'.

That's a might thin thread they're clinging to.

Even their own reporting on the GNB COVIDWATCH page has quietly changed its language concerning risk. As of July 23, 2022, the GNB COVID report stated "Individuals that are unprotected by vaccine continue to have the highest rate of hospitalization for COVID-19 and death".

Then when deaths no longer applied, on July 30th they changed the wording to remove deaths but add ICU, to keep the narrative going. The report changed this statement to "Individuals that are unprotected by vaccine continue to have the highest rate of hospitalization for COVID-19 and ICU admissions".

When data showed that more of the protected class were being hospitalized, on September 17th, the language in the reports still clung to the narrative by removing hospitalizations from the wording but kept ICU admission. The new and improved statement reads "Individuals that are unprotected by vaccine continue to have the highest rate of COVID19 ICU admissions".

See, those statements were great when the numbers were close enough that the rate per 100,000 misled people to think that the unvaccinated were taking up all of the hospital beds or dying in the streets, but not anymore. I wonder when they'll start pointing out the protected are at a greater risk for hospitalizations, ICU admissions and deaths?

Do you know what the unvaccinated are not at increased risk for? Myocarditis, heart attacks and strokes, blood clots, babies stillborn, increased risk of cancer, Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS), and much more.

We're not gloating, we're angry.

Believe me when I say that none of us wanted to be right about these vaccines because most of the people we love took them. Data coming out of Israel last summer showed these vaccines were useless at best, yet all levels of government in Canada still forced them onto their citizens. We're angry. We're angry for the abuse we took, we're angry for the people who were forced to chose between these vaccines and feeding their families, we're angry for the families that were torn apart and we're angry for the health effects we are now seeing in many of the people we love.

It's clear we can drop the effective part of 'safe and effective'. Are we really still supposed to believe they are safe?


If you enjoyed this article and would like to be notified when future articles are available, please subscribe in the link provided at the top of this page.

425 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page